Effects of emerging technologies in Accounting Information Systems- Research Paper

Impacts of rising advancements in Accounting Information Systems-concentrating on XBRL - Research Paper Example Because of various advantages, XBRL caught the market and now-a-days scarcely any greatest economies on the planet, for example, US, China, France and Japan associations are obliged to actualize XBRL for money related revealing (Geerts, Guido, et al 815-840). XBRL guarantees control of information sources and what's more, it guarantees the respectability of announcing data by utilizing the organized configuration of XML that are adjusted to the money related particularities. It helps in encouraging and robotizing the import of information from various processing conditions. Alongside summiting the administrative requirements, the ventures that are executing XBRL are profiting by an inventive setting for development and cost reduction comparative with their revealing procedures. As of late, XBRL has come out to be a reasonable choice for the open parts (Jiu, Li, Wang and Gong 84-96). There exists number of expansions of XBRL, for example, XBRL IFRS and XBRL US GAAP that are made for t he selection of explicit standards and rules for revealing in monetary bookkeeping. The target of the report is to clarify the effects of innovative progressions, for example, XBRL in bookkeeping data framework and its importance. The advancement in the realm of XBRL was incredibly fast, advancing from the condition of activity of American bookkeeping master Charles Hoffman in 1988 to the condition of universal standard that are utilized globally and advanced by countless national and worldwide purviews. Impressive quantities of paper are managing the issues of XBRL and its centrality in bookkeeping data frameworks (Baldwin, Amelia and Trinkle 1-24). This exploration report goes past the examination distraction for receiving XBRL as a standard configuration and apparatus for the most part in business revealing and especially in money related announcing. This exploration report will survey the impacts of developing innovations on bookkeeping data frameworks (AIS) significantly concentrating on XBRL. This

Racism And Discrimination Today Essay Example for Free

Bigotry And Discrimination Today Essay How might you want to be dealt with absolutely due to your social, convictions, custom or even shading? Well this is going on wherever consistently. This is called racial segregation. So what is racial segregation? It isn't knowing the slightest bit about somebody when you see them, yet detesting them at any rate and treating them in an unexpected way, not as a result of what their identity is, yet what they are. What's more Racism began from the past is as yet dynamic today. Bigotry in the past was essentially savage particularly in the mid twentieth Century. At the point when servitude was finished in America in 1865 racial pressure happened. As the free slaves, where permitted to move openly around the land a greater part of the white populace despite everything considered them to be slaves and would not like to associate and associate with them. One case of prejudice is that Research has indicated that educators anticipate that dark kids should fizzle Not just are dark youngsters played in lower sets; they themselves accept that they are sure to fall flat. This is evidence that bigotry is all over and happens from any age gathering. Prejudice has consistently been near. It is one of the world’s MAJOR concerns TODAY. Various individuals are naã ¯ve of how much prejudice attempts in our general public today. Bigotry can be found in occurrences of supremacist misuse, provocation and segregation. Bigotry is the separation of an individual as a result of the race that they have acquired. Bigotry can be said to anybody. It is unquestionably extreme that these things change, however these previous scarcely any years, numerous individuals in the sum total of what nations have been expressing malevolent and rude things around one another’s convention. I can’t worry to state that bigotry is badgering, it is Mistreatment. Individuals think it’s diverting to torment an individual in light of their shading, their complement, culture and now and then even how they are bad in something, this is all prejudice. There are various assorted sorts of prejudice, for instance bigotry due to skin shading, origination, religion and so forth however they all got two or three things in like manner. A wide range of prejudice are appalling and make a negative and now and again perilous enthusiastic reaction. Bigotry prompts social issues as well as in extreme cases it causes psychological sickness and savagery for instance self damage, misery and the hurting of others. By and large it makes the objective feel abandoned, discouraged and furious as the vast majority of you individuals beforehand know as a matter of fact however what you individuals didn’t is that in the most serious cases prejudice prompts self-destructive contemplations and interestingly, in the most pessimistic scenarios these musings are done and its as a rule by a youthful youngster. That’s a youngster with their entire life in front of them guaranteeing their life on the grounds that a couple of individuals can’t acknowledge them since they are somewhat unique. Numerous uproars have been caused all around the globe because of bigotry. As John F. Kennedy had said This country was established by men of numerous countries and foundations, on the rule that all men were made equal.† An explanation which straightforwardly expresses the significance everybody has in this world and the uniformity everybody shares in any case where you are from or what shading you are. Prejudice is continually going to happen yet their will consistently be an opportunity to lessen it. Truth talking there are the same races, yet just one race. Humankind. Much thanks to you for tuning in!

Hw Chapter4

5. 4. You have discovered three speculation decisions for a one-year store: 10% APR Compounded month to month, 10% APR intensified every year, and 9% APR aggravated day by day. Figure the EAR for every venture decision. (Expect that there are 365 days in the year. ) Sol: 1+EAR= (1+r/k)k So, for 10% APR exacerbated month to month, the EAR is 1+EAR= (1+0. 1/12)12 = 1. 10471 => EAR= 10. 47% For 10% aggravated yearly, the EAR is 1+EAR= (1+0. 1)=1. 1 * EAR= 10% (continues as before). For 9% exacerbated day by day 1+EAR= (1+0. 09/365)365 = 1. 09416 * EAR= 9. 4% 5-8. You can acquire $50 in enthusiasm on a $1000 store for eight months.If the EAR is the equivalent paying little mind to the length of the speculation, how much premium will you procure on a $1000 store for a. a half year. b. 1 year. c. 1/2 years. Sol: Since we can win $50 enthusiasm on a $1000 store, Rate of intrigue is 5% Therefore, EAR = (1. 05)12/8 - 1 =7. 593% a) 1000(1. 075936/12 †1) = 37. 27 b) 1000(1. 07593? 1) = 75. 93 c) 1000(1. 075933/2 ? 1) = 116. 03 5-12. Capital One is publicizing a 60-month, 5. 99% APR cruiser credit. On the off chance that you have to obtain $8000 to buy your fantasy Harley Davidson, what will your regularly scheduled installment be? Sol: Discount rate for a year is, 5. 99/12 = 0. 499167%C= 8000/[1/0. 004991(1-1/(1+0. 004991)60)] = $154. 63 5-16. You have quite recently bought a home and taken out a $500,000 contract. The home loan has a 30-year term with regularly scheduled installments and an APR of 6%. a. What amount of will you pay in intrigue, and what amount of will you pay in head, during the principal year? b. How much will you pay in intrigue, and how much will you pay in head, during the twentieth year (I. e. , somewhere in the range of 19 and a long time from now)? Sol: a. APR of 6%/12 = 0. 5% every month. Installment = 500,000/[(1/. 005)(1-1/1. 005360)]= $2997. 75 Total yearly installments = 2997. 75 ? 12 = $35,973. Advance Balance following 1 year is 299 7. 5[1/0. 005(1-1/1. 005348)] = $493,860. Hence, 500,000 †493,860 = $6140 is head reimbursed in first year. Intrigue paid in first year is 35,973 †6140 = $29833. b. Credit balance in 19 years (or 360 †19? 12 = 132 remaining pmts) is 2997. 75[1/0. 005(1-1/1. 005192)]= $289,162 Loan Balance in 20 years = 2997. 75[1/0. 005(1-1/1. 005120)] = $270,018 Therefore, Principal reimbursed = 289,162 †270,018 = $19,144, and Interest reimbursed =$35,973 †19,144 = $16,829. 5-20. Oppenheimer Bank is offering a 30-year contract with an APR of 5. 25%. With this home loan your regularly scheduled installments would be $2000 per month.In expansion, Oppenheimer Bank offers you the accompanying arrangement: Instead of making the regularly scheduled installment of $2000 consistently, you can make a large portion of the installment like clockwork (so you will make 52 ? 2 = 26 installments for each year). With this arrangement, to what extent will it take to take care of the home lo an of $150,000 if the EAR of the advance is unaltered? Sol: For like clockwork installment = 2000/2 = 1000. 1 year = 26 weeks. In this way, (1. 0525)1/26 = 1. 001970. Along these lines, rebate rate = 0. 1970%. Here, PV of credit installments is the remarkable equalization. 150, 000= (1000/0. 001970)[1-1/(1. 001970)N] If we comprehend for N,We get N= 177. 98. In this way, it takes 178 months to take care of the home loan. On the off chance that we choose to pay for about fourteen days, at that point 178*2= 356 weeks. 5-24. You have Visa obligation of $25,000 that has an APR (month to month aggravating) of 15%. Every month you pay the base regularly scheduled installment as it were. You are required to pay just the extraordinary intrigue. You have gotten a proposal via the post office for an in any case indistinguishable Visa with an APR of 12%. In the wake of thinking about the entirety of your other options, you choose to switch cards, turn over the exceptional parity on the old car d into the new card, and get extra cash as well.How much would you be able to obtain today on the new card without changing the base regularly scheduled installment you will be required to pay? Sol: Here the markdown rate = 15/12 = 1. 25%. Accepting that regularly scheduled installment is the intrigue we get, 25,000*0. 15/12= $312. 50. This is ceaselessness. So the sum can be acquired at the new loan cost is this income limited at the new rebate rate. The new rebate rate is 12/12 = 1%. In this way, PV = 312. 50/0. 01 = $31,250. So by exchanging Visas we can spend an extra 31, 250 ? 25, 000 = $6, 250. We don't need to pay burdens on this measure of new getting, so this is our after-tax cut of exchanging cards. - 28. Consider an undertaking that requires an underlying venture of $100,000 and will deliver a solitary income of $150,000 in five years. a. What is the NPV of this undertaking if the five-year financing cost is 5% (EAR)? b. What is the NPV of this venture if the five-year fi nancing cost is 10% (EAR)? c. What is the most elevated five-year financing cost with the end goal that this venture is as yet gainful? Sol: a. NPV = â€100,000 + 150,000/1. 055 = $17,529. b. NPV = â€100,000 + 150,000/1. 105 = â€$6862. Here we have to compute the IRR. Subsequently, IRR = (150,000/100,000)1/5 †1 = 8. 45%. 5-32. Assume the present one-year financing cost is 6%.One year from now, you accept the economy will begin to slow and the one-year loan fee will tumble to 5%. In two years, you anticipate that the economy should be amidst a downturn, making the Federal Reserve cut financing costs definitely and the one-year loan cost to tumble to 2%. The one-year loan cost will at that point ascend to 3% the next year, and keep on ascending by 1% every year until it comes back to 6%, where it will stay from that point on. a. On the off chance that you were sure in regards to these future loan cost changes, what two-year financing cost would be predictable with these d esires? . What current term structure of loan costs, for terms of 1 to 10 years, would be reliable with these desires? c. Plot the yield bend for this situation. How does the one-year loan cost contrast with the 10-year financing cost? Sol: a. The one-year loan cost is 6%. In the event that rates fall one year from now to 5%, at that point in the event that you reinvest because of current circumstances more than two years you would win (1. 06)(1. 05) = 1. 113 for every dollar contributed. This sum relates to an EAR of (1. 113)1/2 †1 = 5. half every year for a long time. In this way, the two-year rate that is reliable with these desires is 5. 0%. b. Year| Future Interest Rate| FV from re-investing| EAR| 1| 6%| 1. 0600| 6. 00%| 2| 5%| 1. 1130| 5. 50%| 3| 2%| 1. 1353| 4. 32%| 4| 3%| 1. 1693| 3. 99%| 5| 4%| 1. 2161 | 3. 99%| 6| 5%| 1. 2769 | 4. 16%| 7| 6%| 1. 3535 | 4. 42%| 8| 6%| 1. 4347 | 4. 62%| 9| 6%| 1. 5208 | 4. 77%| 10| 6%| 1. 6121 | 4. 89%| c. We can get the yield bend by c onsidering all EARs above. It is a rearranged bend. 5-36. You are trying out a MBA program. To pay your educational cost, you can either take out a standard understudy credit (so the intrigue installments are not charge deductible) with an EAR of 5 ? or then again you can utilize a duty deductible home value advance with an APR (month to month) of 6%. You foresee being in a low assessment section, so your expense rate will be just 15%. Which advance would it be advisable for you to utilize? Sol: APR is given, So we can get EAR by, (1+0. 06/12)12 = 1. 06168. Along these lines, EAR = 6. 168%. We need to change over the before charge rate to after expense rate. 6. 168? (1-0. 15) = 5. 243% Since understudy credit is higher after expense rate, it is smarter to utilize home value advance. 5-40. You firm is thinking about the acquisition of another office telephone framework. You can either pay $32,000 now, or $1000 every month for three years. . Assume your firm at present acquires at a p ace of 6% every year (APR with month to month exacerbating). Which installment plan is progressively alluring? b. Assume your firm as of now acquires at a pace of 18% every year (APR with month to month exacerbating). Which installment plan would be progressively appealing for this situation? Sol: a. The installments are as hazardous as the firm’s other obligation. In this way, opportunity cost = obligation rate. PV(36 month annuity of 1000 at 6%/12 every month) = $32,871. So we have to pay money. b. PV(annuity at 18%/12 every months) = $27,661. So we can pay after some time.

Pity and Revenge in Frankenstein and The Cry of the Children - Literature Essay Samples

Both the poem The Cry of the Children by Elizabeth Barrett Browning and the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley portray acts of cruelty in an attempt to arouse pity from readers. The victims in each case feel bitter self-pity and respond with resentment towards those who wrong them. The working class children in the poem and the Monster in Frankenstein are pitiful characters because of how they are treated, but they are not completely helpless. They still can exercise free will and choose how to react to their treatment. There is a great difference in their outward dispositions even though their initial sentiments are similar. Both authors create characters that suffer injustices and desire pity, but their characters’ responses to their challenges determine whether or not they deserve the readers sympathy. The children in Browning’s poem feel sorrow and general despair towards their lives. They look forward to death, saying, â€Å"It is good when it happens† (Brow ning, line 51). The children are brave abou something that is universally feared. Browning uses the childrens unexpected outlook to show how they cope with hardships. They tell those who suggest that they should leave their work and play in the countryside to â€Å"Leave us †¦ from your pleasures fair and fine!† (Browning, lines 63-64). The work never seems to end, as Browning stresses by using the phrase â€Å"all day† three times between lines 73 to 77. Browning emphasizes the childrens misery by showing how they do not even want to think of running and playing: â€Å"If we cared for any meadows, it were merely/To drop down in them and sleep† (Browning, lines 67-68). The children are resentful towards those who do not sympathize with them, but they do not dwell on things they cannot have. In contrast, the Monster in Shelley’s novel allows himself to be consumed by his sorrow until it turns to anger. Early in the story, he is similar to the children in Brownings poem. When he is alone and cold in the forest he sits down and weeps (Shelley 68). However after being rejected by the family he tries to befriend, he says,â€Å"despair had not yet taken possession of me; my feelings were those of rage and revenge† (Shelley 92). The family rejects the monster, but they do not force any further hardships on him. His sorrow is justifiable, but his anger is not. The Monster continues, saying, â€Å"I did not strive to control them; but, allowing myself to be borne away by the stream, I bent my mind towards injury and death† (Shelley 93). The Monster willfully builds up hatred in his heart. Shelley wears away the pity that the audience may feel for the Monster by slowly revealing his cruelty.Meanwhile, in Brownings poem, the children’s response to the injustices they face is that they lack goodness, not that they should embrace evil. They have no faith, for they have received no religious instruction, as is shown in s tanza 10 when they say that they only know two words of a single prayer. They also lack faith in God’s benevolence. They say, â€Å"grief has made us unbelieving† (Browning, line 131). Browning’s readers would have seen faithless children as a tragedy. Browning, however, shows why her young protagonists think that God does not hear them. They say, â€Å"the human creatures near us/Pass by, hearing not, or answer not a word.† (Browning, lines 107-108). It is their simple reasoning that makes them doubt God, rather than any sort of innate cruelty. The Monster’s reasoning is selfish and biased. He attempts to portray himself as innocent and striving for goodness but contradicts himself on multiple occasions. He claims that he â€Å"felt the greatest ardour for virtue rise within me, and abhorrence for vice† (Shelley 87). However, he also admits that he feels a â€Å"bitter gall of envy† (Shelley 87) when he sees the happiness of the fa mily he watches. He feels entitled to a share in their happiness. He views the scientist, Frankenstein, as a God-like figure for having created him, but curses the man for leaving him alone (Shelley 88). The Monster cannot blame anyone for needlessly inflicting such emotional pain on him, but feels wronged because he sees pleasures in the world that he cannot access. Even the children in Browning’s poem do not claim a right to happiness or curse God for their misery. All the children desire is peace. The Monster is capable of sustaining himself without aid and could be free from oppression, but could not be satisfied with this kind of life. Regarding the family he observes, he says, â€Å"my heart yearned to be known and loved by these amiable creatures† (Shelley 89). The monsters desire for love is not a crime, but the resulting anger and plans for revenge make him guilty. He imposes himself on others and is angry when they reject him. Like the Monster, the children feel that their Creator does not love them, if He exists (Browning, lines 125-135). Their reaction, however, is only weeping. The Monster soon determines that Frankenstein is his enemy, referring to him as â€Å"him towards whom I have sworn eternal revenge† (Shelley 97). He blames Frankenstein for all the suffering he experiences. Frankenstein, meanwhile, is not guilty of directly harming the Monster. He admittedly does not love or care for the Monster either, but this does directly connect to the hatred that the Monster feels towards him. When the Monster captures a boy and learns that he is related to Frankenstein, the Monster strangles him out of hatred for Frankenstein. He even relishes this murderous act, saying â€Å"my heart swelled with exultation and hellish triumph† (Shelley 97). The Monster believes that he is justified in seeking revenge because of his unsatisfying existence. He says, â€Å"I am malicious because I am miserable† (Shelley 98), imp lying that misery is sufficient justification for murder. He talks as though he is a victim of far greater injustices than those he was endured. He asserts that he will not submit to â€Å"abject slavery† (Shelley 98), yet there are none who wish to enslave him in any way. He demonstrates that he is capable of deep thought, but persists in trying to justify his crimes in ways that far exceed any committed against him. Unlike the Monster, the Children are forced to work in slave- like conditions. They are oppressed and suffer much greater physical hardships than being unloved. Yet, even as small children, they have more strength of character and forbearance than the Monster. They do feel resentment with their sorrow; â€Å"the child’s sob in the silence curses deeper/Than the strong man in his wrath† (Browning, lines 159 -160). Even in this state, they do not harbour thoughts of revenge and murder. Browning wrote her poem in order to arouse pity from her audience . Her characters maintain a certain level of virtue despite their youth and the cruelty they experience, and therefore would have won her readers over. Shelley’s Monster inspires pity at first, but it soon turns to disgust. Shelley’s work has more depth because it is more than a tragedy or a horror story. It is an example of behaviourism. The Monster tries to claim that his actions are the result of his surroundings and the actions of others; â€Å"Shall I respect man when, he contemns me?† (Shelley 98). He ruins his chances of pity or sympathy by making the choice to inflict suffering on others who cant or wont give him love. His crimes are premeditated. He says, â€Å"I will watch with the wiliness of the snake, that I may sting with its venom† (Shelley 116). Browning’s work forces her readers to face society and understand the victims of hardship, while Shelley’s work makes readers consider the reasons for unhappiness within themselves. Works Cited:Browning, Elizabeth. The Cry of the Children. Norton Anthology of English Literature. 8th ed.Eds. Julia Reidhead et al. New York: W. W. Norton Company, Inc. 2006. 1922-1925. Print Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. New York: W. W. Norton Company, Inc. 1996. 68- 116. Print.

The Home and the World - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 18 Words: 5387 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/09/20 Category Education Essay Type Argumentative essay Did you like this example? The Home and the World From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search The Home and the World   | Book cover| Author| Rabindranath Tagore| Original title| Ghare Baire| Country| India| Language| Bengali| Genre(s)| Autobiographical novel| Publication date| 1916| Media type| Print (Hardback Paperback)| ISBN| NA| The Home and the World 1916 (in the original Bengali, Ghore Baire, lit. At home [and] outside) is a 1916 novel by Rabindranath Tagore. The book illustrates the battle Tagore had with himself, between the ideas of Western culture and revolution against the Western culture. These two ideas are portrayed in two of the main characters, Nikhil, who is rational and opposes violence, and Sandip, who will let nothing stand in his way from reaching his goals. These two opposing ideals are very important in understanding the history of this region and its contemporary problems. There is much controversy over whether or not Tagore was attempting represen t Gandhi in Sandip but many argue that Tagore would not even venture to personify Sandip as Gandhi because Tagore was a large admirer of Gandhi and Gandhi was anti-violence while Sandip would use violence in any respect to get what he wanted. The book shows â€Å"the clash between new and old, realism and idealism, the means and the end, good and evil† (p xxiv) within India and southern Asia. Contents[hide] * 1 Background Context * 1. 1 Political Movement * 1. 2 Traditional Indian Household * 2 Plot summary * 3 Major Events * 3. 1 The Rally * 3. 2 Bimalas Realization * 4 Characters * 4. 1 Nikhil – Husband of Bimala * 4. 2 Bimala – Wife of Nikhil * 4. 3 Sandip * 4. 4 Bara Rani (Bimalas sister-in-law) * 4. 5 Amulya * 5 Important Themes * 5. Nationalism * 5. 2 Tradition vs. Modernism * 5. 3 Sandip vs. Nikhil * 5. 4 Illusions * 5. 5 Truth * 5. 6 Love/Union * 5. 7 The Role of Women * 5. 8 Religion versus Nationalism * 6 Film, TV or theatrical adaptations * 7 Histo rical Context * 8 References * 9 External links| [edit] Background Context [edit] Political Movement The novels setting is in early 20th century India. The story line coincides with the National Independence Movement taking place in the country at the time, which was sparked by the Indian National Congress. There were various national and regional campaigns of both militant and non-violent ideas which all had the common goal of ending British colonial rule. Militant nationalism had a strong showing in the early part of the 20th century, especially during the World War I period. Some examples of this movement are the Indo-German Pact and Ghadar Conspiracy, unfortunately both of these failed. The latter stages of the movement saw a transition to non-violent forms of resistance led by Mohandas Gandhi. India remained a British colony until 1947, when Pakistan (August 14) and India (August 15) gained their freedom. On January 26, 1950, India adopted a constitution and became its ow n republic. At the time of Indian Independence, the Muslim dominated north west and eastern parts of the country were separated to form West Pakistan and East Pakistan (which later became Bangladesh). Particularly important to the novel is an understanding of the Swadeshi movement, as a part of the Indian Nationalist Movement. The Swadeshi Movement started in response to the Partition of Bengal by Lord Curzon which occurred in 1905. The Swadeshi movement was a successful resistance policy against the British colonization. Indian citizens were encouraged to boycott British goods in order to foster Indian identity and independence. This movement was important in fostering the new spirit in India, and separating India from Britain, which was largely thought to be responsible for the subsequent widespread poverty. [edit] Traditional Indian Household Family structures in traditional India consists of not only the nuclear family but also grandparents, parents-in-law, and unmarried sist er-in-laws as well. Though the joint-family is linked to ancient India, its still prevalent in modern day India. Traditionally, baby boys were preferable to baby girls since boys were able to earn money and support the family. Girls on the other hand, were expensive to raise. They didn’t bring home the bread and the girl’s marriage dowry required a hefty amount of money and other luxury goods such as valuable jewelries and saris. Once girls were married off to the other families, they would have to address their new parents-in-law as â€Å"father† and â€Å"mother†. As home maker of the family, the wife’s duty was to supervise the household and take care of the children, she also had to try hard to please her new in-laws. The Home and the World tells us not only the personal struggles of the three main characters, but also little details of the family structure and how traditional Indian households were like. In the book, Bimala starts off as a traditional, obedient house wife who is faithful to her husband and even forces herself to be respectful towards her nagging sister-in-law. â€Å"I would cautiously and silently get up and take the dust of my husband’s feet without waking him, how at such moments I could feel the vermilion mark upon my forehead shining out like the morning star (11)†. However as she falls â€Å"in love† with Sandip, she slowly weens away from her traditional housewife role. She becomes more daring, more confidently brushes off her sister-in-law’s criticisms, and crosses outside the women’s quarter of the house, and easily converses with another man, Sandip, who is not her husband. Through her dilemma, the readers are able to learn about the traditional ways of the Indian household through Bimala’s change from the good house wife to an independent, more modern woman. [edit] Plot summary The novel is set in early 20th century India in the estate of the B engali zamindar Nikhil. He marries Bimala, a woman who is both of a lower status and of a darker complexion, which is contradictory to his family traditions. Their love is idyllic and both are dedicated to one another until the appearance of his friend and radical revolutionist, Sandip. Sandip, a passionate and active man, is a contradiction to the peace-loving and somewhat passive Nikhil. His charismatic speech, support of the Swadeshi movement, and a renewed appreciation of everything Indian while denying everything British garnered support from local natives across the province. After hearing Sandip speak at a rally, Bimala insists that Sandip visit Nikhil’s estate. While visiting, Sandips influential nature easily attracts the innocent and unsuspecting Bimala, and she suggests he make his headquarters at their house. Once empowered by the inside world, knowing only her husband and home, she becomes engaged with the outside world, taking part in the Swadeshi movement by working with Sandip. As the novel develops, Bimala is drawn to Sandip’s passion and the attraction between the two becomes inevitable, producing a love triangle. She begins to question her marriage with Nikhil and finds in Sandip what she has always sought after in a man: zeal, ambition, and a hint of danger. She begins to help Sandip by stealing money from Nikhil’s treasury, convinced that if it is not equally his money as well as hers, then it belongs to the country. While Bimala claims her national duty as motivation, her true intentions lie in pleasing Sandip. Nikhil subsequently discovers their actions, but grants Bimala freedom to grow and choose what she wants in her life (as their marriage was arranged when she was a young girl). Meanwhile, Bimala experiences love for the first time, which ultimately helps her understand that it is indeed her husband Nikhil who really loves her. The novel ends with a riot, resulting in Sandip fleeing the city. Nikhil is mortally wounded in the head. Amulya, a young follower of Sandips movement who considered Bimala as his sister, and whom Bimala thinks of as her son (since she has no children), dies by a bullet through his heart. [edit] Major Events [edit] The Rally Near the beginning of the novel, Nikhil brings his wife Bimala to a political rally in an attempt to get her to join the outside world and get in touch better with â€Å"reality. † Though Bimala had heard of Sandip before this time, and developed a somewhat negative opinion of him, this was the first time she heard Sandip speak. This event not only changes her opinion of Sandip, but affects her entire outlook on her life both at home and in the outside world. â€Å"I was no longer the lady of the Rajah’s house, but the sole representative of Bengal’s womanhood,† Bimala says (31). I returned home that evening radiant with a new pride and joy. † After returning home, Bimala asks her husband to invit e Sandip to their home for dinner, setting the plot of the novel in motion. [edit] Bimalas Realization Towards the end of the book Sandip convinces Bimala to steal from her husband, Nikhil. While in the act of stealing 6000 rupees, she comes to a realization of the terrible crime she is committing, I could not think of my house as separate from my country: I had robbed my house, I had robbed my country. For this sin my house had ceased to be mine, my country also was estranged from me (144). This represents a character turning point for Bimala: While in the act of thieving, she realizes that Sandip is not only corrupting and robbing the nation, but encouraging her and others to do the same. Ultimately, she ends up giving the money to Sandip and receives unceasing praise from both Sandip and Amulya for her newly recognized sin. However, Bimala realizes that she has made a mistake by stealing the money from Nikhil and attempts to have Amulya pawn off some of her jewelry in order to replace the money. Amulya attempts to give the box back, but Sandip steals it and gives it back himself. This event allows both Amulya and Bimala to see that Sandip is concerned only with himself, thus allowing them to break free from part of his web. It is during this time that Bimala realizes her power over Sandip by being able to easily make him jealous. [edit] Characters [edit] Nikhil – Husband of Bimala Nikhil is seen and described as an educated and gentle man. The reader can see that as the story is told from his point of view. His words flow more poetically, as if possessing a higher proficiency of language. He is from an aristocratic family of landlords, and his family prides themselves in beautiful women. However, Nikhil is different in that he married not only a poor woman, but also one who was not particularly attractive. Nikhil loves his wife very much as he likes to buy her European style dresses and other modern gifts. He also tries to educate her about the outside world and bring her away from the traditional female life in India. However, due to his gentle and soft nature, he cannot do anything but watch and standby as he sees a relationship unfolding between his wife and his old friend, Sandip. He is also unpopular in the town because he has not joined them stating, I am not running amuck crying Bande Mataram. (42) In light of this, the police also suspect him of harboring some hidden protest. In reality, Nikhil considers himself to be more aware of his countrys role in a broader sense, and refuses to take part in Swadeshi. He claims that [He] is willing to serve [his] country; but [his] worship he reserves for Right which is far greater than [his] country. (29) In traditional texts Nikhils full name reads as Nikhilesh. Its literal translation is Lord of the Universe with Nikhil being literally translated to whole and insinuating harmony, wisdom, and awareness. edit] Bimala – Wife of Nikhil Bimala is described as not very pretty and from a much more humble background than Nikhil. She loves her husband dearly, and enjoys being completely devoted to him. At the beginning of the novel, she seems to be confined to the traditional female role, and has no thoughts of entering the real world, even with persuasion from her husband. Her feelings make a rapid change with the occurrence of the Swadeshi movement. My sight and my mind, my hopes and my desires, became red with the passion of this new age(26). When she meets Sandip, her new ideals are fueled by his zealous nature and a fiery, shameless side of her emerges. As time goes on she becomes more interested and involved in the Swadeshi movement; it is at this time that she starts to develop romantic feelings for Sandip. Literally translated Bimala means without mal or blemish. It is often used to mean clean, pure, and immaculate. Oftentimes the name is shortened to Bimal. Although Bimala is married to Nikhil and their marriage was arranged since sh e was a little girl, Nikhil believes that Bimala is free to make her own decisions to her life. I was married into a Rajah’s house. When I was a child, I was quite familiar with the description of the Prince of the fairy story† (17-18). Therefore, Bimala is very dedicated to her husband, her marriage, and most importantly, her family values. However, Nikhil sometimes questions her view of him, basically that of a traditional woman. She cannot stand her husbands idleness, and unwillingness to participate in more patriotic endeavors. Bimala has no patience with patience. She loves to find in men the turbulent, the angry, the unjust. Her respect must have its element of fear. ( 42)Bimala was not raised the way her husband was raised: well and educated. However, she understands the social differences between her and her husband. â€Å"My husband’s grandmother and mother were both renowned for their beauty†¦ [o]nly the auspicious marks with which I was endowed g ained me an entry into this family – otherwise, I had no claim to be here† (21). [edit] Sandip Sandip is the third major character in the novel, completing the love triangle. He is a guest in the home of Nikhil and Bimala and his revolutionary ideas and speeches have a significant impact on Bimala. He is very vocal in his anti-imperialistic views and is a skilled orator. Sandip represents characteristics that are directly opposite to those Nikhil possesses, thus drawing Bimala to Sandip. Bimala gets caught up in the ideas that Sandip presents as well as the man himself. Her seemingly increasing patriotism causes her to spend more and more time with Sandip, thereby solidifying the love triangle conflict. Where her husband is reserved and proper, Sandip is impassioned and stirs the emotions not only of Bimala, but the people of Bengal. He spreads the notion of â€Å"Swadeshi†, or using goods made locally and boycotting British goods. However, his character is far from the ideal patriot. His motivations are selfish at times, prompted by the need to better himself socially. He fools people with his mask of goodness, something that Nikhil sees through at the beginnings of Sandips relationship with his wife. I have been noticing for some time that there is a gross cupidity about Sandip. His fleshly feelings make him harbor delusions about his religion and impel him into a tyrannical attitude in his patriotism. His nature is coarse, and so he glorifies his selfish lusts under high-sounding names (43). At one point he convinces Bimala to steal from her house and her husband for the â€Å"cause†. Sandip’s presence in the novel concludes with him fleeing while his speeches and ideas result in communal riots. Sandips full name is Sandip Babu. His first name is translated to with dipa(light fire flame). According to the notes in the novel this is used to describe him as inflaming, exciting, arousing. Sandips last name Babu origin ated as an aristocratic title however has come to describe Bengalis educated in the west, or comparable settings. The British used Babu as a patronizing term however, its usage as an honorific title still survives in India today. [edit] Bara Rani (Bimalas sister-in-law) Bimala and her sister-in-laws relationship is strained at best. Bimalas sister-in-law causes a lot of tension in the household. Bara Rani also uses Nikhil to get the material items that she desires. Bimala constantly complains about her to Nikhil. Bara Rani taunts Bimala for her mingling with Sandip Babu. [edit] Amulya Bimala considers Amulya to be her adoptive son, whom she met from the Swadeshi Movement. When first they meet, Bimala asks him to acquire money for their cause. He lists wild schemes and plans, to which Bimala replies you must not be childish (138) After pondering their situation, Amulya resolves to murder the cashier for the money. Tagore uses him to symbolize the raw emotion and passion, yet la ck of sympathy for others often emcompassed by group or riot mentality. Tagore also characterizes Amulya as the typical idealistic youth when Amulya rationalizes the murder with a phrase from the Bhagavad-Gita stating Who kills the body kills naught! (139) Amulya is used as a parallel to Sandip, comparing follower to leader. When Bimala shows such sympathy by calling him little brother, he is caught off guard, suggesting that the youth is even more impressionable with emotions than Sandips ideals. Amulya struggles, as any youth, between completing the goals of the movement and developing strong relationships on an individual level, such as with Bimala; this is made extremely difficult by Sandips powerful influence. Amulya frequently accepts Sandips motives by rationalizing the necessary actions. In a sense, he can be considered a pawn used by Bimala and Sandip in their strategic power struggle, particularly when Bimala requests he sell her jewels. [edit] Important Themes [edit] N ationalism While the entire novel centers around the Swadeshi movement, the author of the novel is not advocating it but rather warning his audience of the dangers of such a movement. Tagore knows that it is possible for even a seemingly peaceful movement to turn quickly into aggressive nationalism. Such a change would do the country more harm than good. The character named Sandip is the vivacious and ardent leader of Swadeshi. He knows that his movement has the potential to turn ugly. He fervently believes however that freedom must be achieved no matter the cost. On page 123-4, Sandip cites a story from the Bhagavad Gita in support of his own path. The story tells of the Hindu Lord Krishna advising Arjuna to perform his duty as a warrior regardless of the result. Sandips use of the Hindu epic poetry to support his movement illustrates the tendency of individuals to use religion as a basis for nationalism. The use of excerpts from the Indian epic poem was indicative of the ble nding tradition elements of Indian culture with the ideals and goals of modern Indian Independence movement. As both have the potential to yield individuals claiming an unshakable fervor for their cause, this can be a rather dangerous combination, a fact clearly acknowledged by the novels author. Nationalism is also expressed through the rejection of foreign goods, which was a part of the Swadeshi movement. Sandip was strongly against the sale of foreign goods as Bimala stated that Sandip laid it down that all foreign articles, together with the demon of foreign influence, must be driven out of our territory (97). Nikhil on the other hand felt the opposite. He stated that in terms of banishing foreign goods from his Suskar market that he could not do it (101) and he refused to tyrannize (108). Bimala even pleaded with her husband to order them to be cleared out! (108). She also stated that banishing foreign goods would not be tyranny for selfish gain, but for the sake of the cou ntry (109). [edit] Tradition vs. Modernism As the title suggests, a major theme is the relationship of the home with the outside world. Nikhil enjoys the modern, western goods and clothing and lavishes Bimala with them. However, Bimala, in the Hindu tradition, never goes outside of the house complex. Her world is a clash of western and traditional Indian life. She enjoys the modern things that Nikhil brings to her, but when Sandip comes and speaks of nationalism with such fire, she sees these things as a threat to her way of life. Bimala’s struggle is with identity. She is part of the country, but only knows the home and her home is a mix of cultures. She is torn between supporting the ideal of a country that she knows she should love, or working toward ensuring that her home, her whole world, is free from strife and supporting her husband like a traditional Indian woman should. Bimala is forced to try to understand how her traditional life can mix with a modern world a nd not be undermined. This theme ties in with the nationalism theme because it is another way that Tagore is warning against the possibility that nationalism can do more harm than good.. [edit] Sandip vs. Nikhil Nikhil and Sandip have extremely different views for the growth of the nation. Nikhil believes in a nation that is peaceful, demonstrates the equality of individuals, and respects social harmony. Nikhil demonstrates these beliefs in him marrying Bimala, an unattractive woman because of her skin color. In the novel, Nikhil talks about disliking an intense patriotism nation, Use force? But for what? Can force prevail against Truth? (45). On the other hand, Sandip has contrasting views for the growth of the nation believing in power and force, My country does not become mine simply because it is the country of my birth. It becomes mine on the day when I am able to win it by force. 45) The contradicting views of Nikhil and Sandip set up the story and constructs an interesting dilemma for Bimala. Unfortunately for Nikhil, he has already tried to show Bimala the outside world, and stir some sort of emotion within her since the beginning of the novel, and failed. Sandip possesses great oratory skill, that wins Bimala over simply because of his passion and ferocity, something that her husband may lack. [edit] Illusions The constant forming of illusions in the novel grows to be a major recurring theme. Sandip tends to create illusions that almost always have negative affects on his followers and on the nation of Bengal. He builds an illusion of his beliefs that sucks the people of Bengal into a sort of cult. His illusion is complete sovereignty, free of all other worlds, and an endless supply of wealth and self enjoyment. This illusion, as many are, is a fake and a lie. It ultimately sells these people a front row ticket to watch their nation fall into complete chaos and civil war among people with different beliefs. He constructs an illusion for Bimala t o believe, saying she is the future, women are the future, they are the chosen path to salvation. Bimala builds an illusion that she is to blame for this war, it is solely her doing. That she has done all wrong and no right. She refuses to accept that she too was a victim of Bande Mataram. I now fear nothing-neither myself, nor anybody else. I have passed through fire. What was inflammable has been burnt to ashes; what is left is deathless. I have dedicated myself to the feet of him, who has received all my sin into the depths of his own pain. (199)The biggest illusion of all of is his mask of caring and passion, while he hides his own selfishness and desire for the world. edit] Truth In more than one way, this novel is a comparison of different views of truth. Which reality is truer is up to the readers interpretation. Nikhil maintains an idealistic view of the world while Sandip takes a radical, nature-worshiping view. He feels Nikhils view of the world is inferior to the rea l, raw world in which he lives as a radical leader. Bimala as well must compare truths. Through her interactions with Sandip, she is introduced to the truth of sakti (female power), yet her life with Nikhil is centered on the truth of conjugality. Each of these instances is a comparison of truth as being something simply objective to being something with a more spiritual or moral dimension. While the story ends in tragedy, both views of truth are important players in the storys outcome, and it is left to the reader to ponder with which he or she agrees or disagrees. [edit] Love/Union From page one of the novel, the love and union between Nikhil and Bimala is illustrated as something sacred. Nikhil proved throughout the story that he was undeniably devoted to his wife. He proved this first by marrying a woman who hailed from a poor family, along with accepting her darker skin. He made great effort to not only educate her, but also for her to understand her place in the world an d not just her place in the captivity of their house. He shows his love by giving her freedom. Bimala also adores her husband, but in a less material manner. This is demonstrated in Bimalas daily ritual of taking the dust, an Indian ritual of reverence not usually performed by a wife to her husband. Due to Bimala’s extreme devotion to Nikhil, In the beginning of the novel, the union between the two of them is seen as one that cannot be broken. However as, the story progresses, Bimala is slowly overcome by her feelings for Sandip. She eventually realizes that she has found in Sandip what she longed for in Nikhil, fierce ambition and even violent defense of ones ideals. Her deep desire for Sandip led her to completely break her scared union with Nikhil, going as far as to steal money from her household funds. Sandip shows his love for Bimala through idolization. This idolization comes about due to her freedom though. The tale clearly presents the theme of love and union time and time again, going from Nikhil and Bimalas marriage, through the love triangle created by Sandip, and once again returning to Bimalas love for Nikhil at the very end. This story tests the boundaries of the union of marriage. It stretches and twists it to the point where a 9 year marriage is nearly destroyed simply because of a raw temptation. In addition to the idea of romantic love, there is a sense of love of owns country depicted throughout the novel. Questions such as, is it best to love ones country through action, perhaps even violence, or by passive tolerance are posed in the arguments of Nikhil and Sandip. While love and worship seem parallel in marriage, Nikhil believes these feelings cannot apply to ones country. To worship my country as a god is to bring a curse upon it(29). [edit] The Role of Women Throughout the novel as stated earlier a strong sense of devotion is seen in the relationship between Bimala and Nikhil. It is key to notice that an indirect evaluation of the role of women is seen in this novel also, in a very subtle manner. In the society described, Bimala, like most women, blindly worships her husband. This can be seen when, Bimala is described, taking the dust of my husbands feet without waking him, and when she is caught doing this act of kindness, her reaction is, That had nothing to do with merit. It was a womans heart, which must worship in order to love. (18). This seen shows the average woman in this society who believes love will happen and worship is a given in a marriage. She blindly respects her husband without understanding or having a grasp of who he is. Another one of the many scenes that alludes to a womans place in this society is when Nikhil and Sandip Babu argue and Bimala is asked her opinion, which she finds unusual, in addition to Never before had I [Bimala] had an opportunity of being present at a discussion between my husband and his men friends (38). This line shows how there is a strong disconnec t and there is no place, usually, for a woman in real world conversations. To further prove this,in Nikhils story, the role of a woman is seen clearly,Up till now Bimala was my home-made Bimala, the product of the confined space and the daily routine of small duties (42). The indirect references and descriptions are quite frequent throughout the novel and clearly allows the reader to get a sense of what women were subject to and their overall role in the society. [edit] Religion versus Nationalism One major theme in the novel is the importance of religion and on the other hand nationalism. In this novel, religion can be seen as the more â€Å"spiritual view† while nationalism can be seen more as the â€Å"worldly view. † Nikhil’s main perspective in life is by the moral and intangible while Sandip is more concerned about the tangible things, which to him is reality. Sandip believes that this outlook on life, living in a way where one may follow his or her pas sions and seek immediate gratification, is what gives strength and portrays reality, which is linked to his strong belief in nationalism. From Sandip’s point of view, â€Å"when reality has to meet the unreal, deception is its principal weapon; for its enemies always try to shame Reality by calling it gross, and so it needs must hide itself, or else put on some disguise† (Tagore 55). To Sandip, reality consists of being â€Å"gross,† â€Å"true,† â€Å"flesh,† â€Å"passion,† â€Å"hunger, unashamed and cruel† (Tagore 55). On the other hand, Nikhi’s view is more concerned with controlling one’s passions and living life in a moral way. He believes that it is, â€Å"a part of human nature to try and rise superior to itself,† rather than living recklessly by acting on instinct and fleshly desires (Tagore 57). Nikhil argues that a person must learn to control their passions and â€Å"recognize the truth of rest raint† and that â€Å"by pressing what we want to see right into our eyes we only injure them: we do not see† (Tagore 60). All these moral precepts tie in with his faith. Nikhil also speaks from a more religious perspective when he speaks of how â€Å"all at once my heart was full with the thought that my Eternal Love was steadfastly waiting for me through the ages, behind the veil of material things† (Tagore 66). This shows that Nikhil does not live morally just for the sake of trying to be good but that it is grounded in his religious views. Sandip reiterates the fact that in their country, they have both â€Å"religion and also our nationalism† and that â€Å"the result is that both of them suffer† (Tagore 80). [edit] Film, TV or theatrical adaptations Ghare Baire was first released at the Cannes Film Festival in France on May 22, 1984, under the direction of Satyajit Ray. It was also nominated for the Golden Palm award, one of the highest awa rds received at the Cannes Film Festival. It was later released in the United States on June 21, 1985. The scriptwriters were Satyajit Ray (writer) and Rabindranath Tagore (novel). Sandip was played by Soumitra Chatterjee, Nikhilesh was played by Victor Banerjee and Bimala was played by Swatilekha Chatterjee. At the beginning of the movie a woman tells the story of the events in her life and how they changed her perspective on the world. She recalls how her husband challenged traditions by providing her with education and letting her, a married woman, out of seclusion. Her husband’s friend is a leader in the rebellion against the British when they come to visit and the movie takes off from there. [edit] Historical Context The story of The Home and the World takes place in 1916 in the Bangladesh Region. From the period of 1858 to 1947, the British Empire ruled 8 major provinces throughout the region of India. These regions include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Singapore, and Bur ma. Drawn to region for trading purposes, the British soon had set up an expansive empire most noteworthy the East India Trading Company. Not only was it one of the biggest trading powers in the world, it also allowed Britain to enlarge its already huge Navy. The majority of the local people in India did not like being under Colonial Rule resulting in many rebellions. These uprising became known as the Indian Independence Movement. This movement included a variety of political parties, ideas, and movements that all strived to end British rule. Perhaps the greatest influence on the people of India came from the ideas and beliefs of Mohandas Gandhi who stressed that non violence was the ultimate tool to opposing foreign rule. [1] Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Home and the World" essay for you Create order

Human Resources In Organisations - Analytical Report Case Study

Essays on Selection Strategy for Merino Textiles Case Study The paper "Selection Strategy for Merino Textiles" is an excellent example of a case study on human resources. Merino Textiles (MT), a company dealing with the production of woolen and worsted textile products in Australia is faced with the dilemma of selecting qualified staff due to its HR poor strategies in the process. This task is being undertaken by Louise who is the only staff in HR and Brian who has been general manager of MT for the past four years and has been employed with MT for 20 years rising from an apprentice textile mechanic to become a general manager. Louise has been in her position for just 12 months and she has always wanted the management to look at the issue of hiring a qualified graduate to be assisting in the HR office. This paper will be looking at various strategies that an HR professional would provide for the new selection strategy of the staff for the MT organization. The proposal will be used to convince the management of the recommendations of the selec tion of employees. In addition, the paper will be looking at the new selection strategy for hiring the HR graduate and blanket machine operator as specific examples to clearly demonstrate to Brian the benefits of such an approach. There are various strategies that will be analyzed among them being, offering enough time during the interview, being legal in the hiring process i.e. following all the legal procedures in the process, offering equal employment opportunities in the hiring process and selecting the candidates based on their expertise and merit.1.0 Introduction Human resources are all individuals involved in one way or another in the effective running of a business, organization or group (Bohlander, G, and Snell, S., 2010). At MT (Merino Textiles), the company has recently been acquired by an investment company. This has the company has committed 20 million dollars towards expanding the blanket-making section of the mill. This expansion will see production capacity to triple the current production in this section. The existing machinery will also be given a complete overhaul by the maintenance staff and the number of employees employed in this department will rise from 2070. At the moment, MT is due to commence a recruitment drive that has never been experienced before. Brian and Louise have been mandated with the process of ensuring successful hiring and selection of new staff in the human resource department and blanket –machine operator. Their task will include interviewing and hiring the candidates in order to select the best candidates to fill the positions. This report will discuss some of the important strategies that should be applied by the management during the interview and the selection process. 2.0 Purpose The purpose of this report is to make recommendations to the management of the selected strategies that are to be used by the management in the process of the new selection for the MT staff. The report will be focusing specificall y on the hiring of the new human resource graduate and the blanket –machine operator.

Comparison of Witchcraft and Statanism free essay sample

There are many myths and misconceptions about Wicca or Witchcraft and Satanism that are often held by people of other faith based belief systems. If you go by some of the Evangelical Christians definition of a Satanist you are left with a very large percentage of the population being Satanist as only about 10% of the world’s population is Christian. They often think any religion that is not theirs has to be therefore a Satanist; hence Wicca or The Craft is thereby Satanic in nature. Wicca is a Nature based Neopagan religion. It is a giving and loving religion. Satanism also is an Earth based Neopagan religion. It on the other hand is very self centered and idiosyncratic. They have many similarities and differences from theology, principles and philosophy, ritual practices, magic/k use, and of course the use of magical tools in ritual. When looking at the differences in the two faiths they are so opposite it is uncanny how so many people see them as one and the same. When theology is brought into light between the two faiths one must see the many similitudes and differentiations in theologies alone. According to the Church of Satan, and its founder Anton LaVey, the religion of Satanism is an agnostic or atheistic religion. Satan is a symbol, nothing more, LaVey says. Satan signifies our love of the worldly and our rejection of the pallid, ineffectual image of Christ on the cross. Turn around and take a look at Wicca and The Craft and you will see it has so many traditions that it isn’t merely a monotheistic religion but due to the many sects and traditions it is also seen as a duotheistic, polytheistic, and henotheistic culture. Some sects are as Satanists believe, and are an atheistic religion. So in some sects Wicca and The Craft are so similar in nature to Satanism that many are duped into thinking they are one and the same. The most common sect in Wicca is of that of a duotheistic religion. The belief in Goddess/God as deity is common but many henotheistic chapters exist. Henotheistic beliefs are that the Goddess/God is a part of â€Å"The One†. As seen in Before Time Was, by Scott Cunningham, â€Å"Before time was, there was The One; The One was all, and all was The One. And the vast expanse known as the universe was The One, all wise, all pervading, all powerful, eternally changing. And space moved. The One molded energy into twin forms, equal but opposite, fashioning the Goddess and God from The One and of The One. † Thus, whereas Satanists believe more in the symbolism of what Satan represents, most Wiccans believe in a faith based deity of some sort. Principles of Wicca and Satanism are about as different as apples and oranges. Wiccans believe in a set of principles that were set by the American Council of Witches back in 1974. The 13 principles all witches follow are far from the Satanists 9 Satanic Statements. Witches believe in the attunement with nature and its seasons, placing great importance on our environment and community, that the divine power is within all people as we are but vessels of their power, that power is to be used for the benefit of others, not to be used for the advancement of the self, and that witches need to dwell not just on this plane but also on the spiritual plane in order to achieve balance. The acceptance that all religions hold merit to their believers and that true power lies in the belief that tolerance of all faiths and a firm grasp that Wicca may be the witches way to what they feel is right but that John Doe has his belief system and who are they to judge another. When taking a glance at the 9 Satanic Statements one can see the huge discrepancies between the two faiths. With LaVey’s statements of what Satanism represents we are told to indulge the self, vital existence over dreams and hopes, undefiled wisdom over self deceit, kindness only to those who deserve it and not to be shared with those deemed unworthy, and that revenge is better than turning the other cheek. The only philosophy I found that was similar is the Harm none that is a law of magic power and its usage. Satanists, however do not apply it to all, according to the 11 Satanic Rules For Earth, the only 2 beings safe are small children and beasts that are not a source of food or killed due to self defense. In the practice of religious ritual many of the same characteristics have been used in the construction of base rituals used by both religions. The pre burning times Catholic Church is where Church of Satan has based its most famous of all rituals the famed â€Å"Black Mass†. Wiccans do not however have any masses held at all. They do both follow the pagan wheel of time calling the Sabbats and Esbats by differing names. For those who are laymen, a Sabbat is a religious holiday marking a significant point in the year. While Wiccans celebrate Esbats, full moon celebrations, Satanists don’t seem to follow the pagan year at all they only celebrate spring and fall equinoxes, and summer and winter solstices. Satanists see the biggest holy day of the year as an individual Satanists birthday. Wicca celebrates no such thing. â€Å"In his book Satanism, Bob Larson states that the most important Satanic day is the individual members birthday. Walpurgisnacht (April 30) and Halloween (October 31) are also important. But in his Appendix D, he states that Satanists have copied the seasonal calendar of Wicca. Besides the equinoxes and solstices, the only Sabbats both religions celebrate are Beltane/Wapurgisnacht, Apr 30, (when the Goddess/God procreate and scatter the seeds of life across the lands) and Samhain/Halloween Oct. 31 (when the God dies a death only to be reborn within the Goddess as her unborn child). When looking for the reasons Satanists celebrate these holy days I as a researcher could f ind no explanation as to why they celebrate some holy days yet did not even try to incorporate other holy days that Wiccans celebrate. Magic/k is called â€Å"The Power† by most Wiccan sects. It has a set of laws that each individual witch must adhere to diligently. The law of power actually is a list of not just the 1st law known by most as â€Å"An it harm none do as thou wilt† but as a list of 6 rules governing its use. Wiccan traditions go by the use of magic/k as need dictates, and do not use it in a frivolous manner. Most will also not use it on themselves unless doing so harms no one else. They also believe that money shouldn’t be exchanged for using magic/k to assist or help others. They believe that the use of magic/k and having the Goddess/God energies flow thru them is a gift that should never be abused or misused. In Scott Cunningham’s, Wicca: A Guide for the Solitary Practitioner, The Law of the Power states, â€Å"1. The Power shall not be used to bring harm, to injure or control others, but if need arises, it may be used to protect you and those close to you. † A Satanist’s use of magic/k power is very different by their use of angels, arch angels, demons, and daemons. Satanists often raise the energies and magic/ks and instead of directing towards others is often directed toward themselves often fulfilling the 1st of the 9 Satanic statements and indulging themselves in its rewards. On the Church of Satan’s website there is a link to membership, this costs the applicant 200 dollars, which is non refundable. So again the Satanists follow a different set of rules. Wiccan sects often find that Satanists more often than not totally ignore the Laws of Magic/k Power. One analogy is that witchcraft is divine oriented hence is for others or community hence Divine law, Satanists on the other hand follow Satan’s 9 Statements and follow self indulgence and selfishness hence Satan’s law. One of the biggest areas of similarities and differences is in magical tools, Witches or Wiccans use many of the same tools as Satanists such as Athame, (Male symbolism, in Satanism, God symbolism in Wicca), Bolline, (practical knife, both), Chalice, (feminine symbolism in Satanism, Goddess symbolism in Wicca) but the next tool that is the most confused in all of Neopaganism we hit the Pentacle with Wiccans. A five pointed top pointing star surrounded oft times by a circle. Joseph Barressi explained it well when he said, It is more of a religious symbolism that is commonly explained by reference to the basic understanding that the five points of the pentagram represent the four elements air, earth, fire, and water with the addition of Spirit as the uppermost point. † Therefore, Divine Spirit rules over the elements keeping balance. Most Wiccans believe if it is consecrated in a magic circle that it has protective and grounding properties. Satanist’s version of a Pentacle is an Inverse Pentacle called a Pentagram. Satanists see the five pointed star as a symbol of Satan himself. Joseph Barressi, states, A reversed pentagram, with two points projecting upwards, is a symbol of evil and attracts sinister forces because it overturns the proper order of things and demonstrates the triumph of matter over spirit. It is the goat of lust attacking the heavens with its horns, a sign execrated by initiates. † Which makes perfect sense, when you add in to the selfish nature of The 9 Satanic Statements and 11 Satanic Rules for Earth; The Satanist wants the triumph of matter over spirit. The very sign it uses to represent itself is exactly as their Master Satan who according to Christianity, did exactly that and tried to overturn the heavens. So when seeing so many similarities, it should be easier to see why so many make the mistake of calling a Witch a Satanist. The differences show how the witch wants to help those in need in her community, tries to live green with her environment, and is a true Altruist. The Satanist by living by Satan’s laws of 11 Rules of Earth and 9 Statements prove that the Satanist is a true Narcissist. These two faiths are far from each other in almost all ways. So the Witch isn’t a Satanist any more than the Satanist is a Wiccan.